Imagery Empowers Appeals for Dog Shelter & LAHSA Staff Funds as Fiscal Year Ends

Are the social media images of a pair of dogs with iv lines timed for discussion on 7/1/26 budget cuts? The dogs, living on the street, are used by dealers to test for fentanyl

The three failed responsibilities, with dramatic repercussions, by LA City/County are

  • Department of Children and Family Services  (DCFS)
  • L.A. Animal Services
  • Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority

When budget cuts occur it is these services which garner enough attention to adjust the budget BUT NOT THE SERVICE EFFICIENCY 


Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS)

Proposed budget includes a $88.9 million (3%) cut across all departments LA County Budget 

  • Elimination of 310 vacant positions  - Budget Positions 9,888
  • Reductions in various programs. 
  • Potential loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding
  • Tentative $4 billion settlement of thousands of childhood sexual assault claims brought under AB 218.  
  • Gross Appropriation ($3.5B)  3,525,369,000 
  • Meanwhile, the Director has submitted his resignation after the 4/14/26 meeting discussion concerning sibling placement

Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority


Los Angeles Animal Services

  • One aspect of the proposed 2026-27 budget eliminates funding for Dogs Playing for Life (DPFL)
    • According to hellosouthladogs & Restore DPFL Funding
      • The South LA Shelter has 200 dogs - the most of any L.A. shelter
      • Only 28 have been walked by a volunteer, averaging 63 days since their last outing
      • DPFL entire contract is < 1/100th of 1% of the City's 14.85B budget
      • They are asking for a- Call to Action Go to savedpfl.org.
      • They are also asking for the public to address the Council "Mon 4/27 @ 3:30 PM John Ferraro Council Chamber, Rm 340 200 N Spring St You get 1 minute. Say your name, your district, and: “Restore funding for Dogs Playing for Life at LAAS. Do not let it lapse July 1"
More News from Los Angeles
I'm interested
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive